Answer: It depends upon what the Monarch of the country of ones nationality wants.(effectively)
If the Monarch believes the principles of the Bible are necessary, we have to see them as a vital component of our nature constituting our Kingdom. Even the principles of Christianity regardless of race or personal religion in a Christian Country like the UK. This does not mean we have to all be Christians or follow Christianity as a religion. Can you see the difference?
I, Nicholas believes actually, that noone is meant to be a christian, like those of them in the New Testement, but only use it's PRINCIPLES according to context found in life. This must be heartfelt however, not only rules to follow.
However equality is the thing, we should never apportion people to roles from the Bible affording them the idea of it being some kind of privilege exception. It isn't. Biblical principles give us our dignity as human beings, not Biblical roles. Recent History has proven this.
As I keep saying here on my website, misuse of the Bible is worse than not knowing the Bible.
THIS MEANS FOLLOWING BIBLICAL PRINCIPLES AS A GUIDELINE FOR LIVING CORRECTLY; NOT ASSUMING BIBLICAL ROLES.
WHAT I AM SAYING IS THAT INTERPRETING THE BIBLE CORRECTLY (CORRECTLY DERIVED BIBLICAL PRINCIPLES) IS ESSENTIAL IN APPROPRIATING IT'S USEFULNESS AS A HELP TO US IN LIFE. MIS-INTERPRETATION (EVANGELICAL/ASSUMING BIBLICAL ROLES) IS HARMFUL AND DESTRUCTIVE.
I know that Great Britain wants people to be Christian, not Christians. (what I mean is we should not be christians, but have christian values according to context)
We are all the Queen's subjects, not just some of us, here in the UK.
(Ephesians 1:9&10 “And he made known to us the mystery of will according to his good pleasure, which he purposed in Christ, to be put into effect when the times will have reached their fulfilment – to bring all things in heaven and on earth together under one head, even Christ.”)
Anyone who doesn't agree is only an OBJECT (they object) not a subject.
Being a subject is a higher status than being an object and objecting makes one into a reprobate (an object); a base-born. Subjects of the Queen are in reality actual members of the Royal Family of the United Kingdom. Yes! It's a family!
I have never considered myself an object though the evangelical rebellious church movement placed me in a role different to everyone else as being a born-again christian. This I believe, was against what the Queen wants. Though she DID WANT me to understand the Bible. The evangelical movement seriously owes me an apology for ruining my life (they didn't respect me as equal to them).
I have not had this apology, only them trying to justify what they did and not apologize. I do not believe they did what the Queen wanted however she allowed it so I would learn the Bible and from that receive a measure of her protection from her Kingdom derived by being founded upon the Bible. This is why she allowed it.
Evangelical's told me that homosexuality is wrong. Actually, the Bible does not actually say this because of the doctrine that applies to it in response (see my adjacent project on when to be eating oranges). The evangelicals assumed I am homosexual but in fact I am actually bi-sexual.
I do not believe homosexuality is wrong. Nor do some Jewish men.
I believe having a homosexual side is good and healthy, as is liking wearing a shirt and tie and liking other men wearing a shirt and tie, even in a sexual way. It means such men like having discipline.
I have always been sexually stimulated by wearing a fucking-shirt and tie- I love wearing a shirt and tie, I love how it looks and how it feels and I love seeing other men wearing this as normal clothes. Especially other men who LIKE wearing this. It satisfies me in my solar-plexus and makes me happy. I like calling a smart business shirt a fucking shirt because that is how it makes me feel. It is spiritual and makes me feel sexual and healthy and clean.
The evangelicals made me feel this was an undesirable lust of the flesh instead of something pure and wholesome for men, including the sexual side.
I do not believe the Queen at any time supported the evangelical movement placing me in a role taken from the Bible and they then assumed roles themselves to consolidate it. At the time I thought I was highly privileged.
You know what goes around comes around and it was actually
ISRAEL that unraveled me. (All that talk of Christianity got me to ISRAEL)
Thanks be to God.
Nicholas